A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis


This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.

Systematic Review

1

Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150040, China

2

Swiss University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, SWISS TCM UNI, High-Tech Acupuncture and Digital Chinese Medicine, 5330 Bad Zurzach, Switzerland

3

President of the International Society for Medical Laser Applications (ISLA Transcontinental), German Vice President of the German-Chinese Research Foundation (DCFG) for TCM, Honorary President of the European Federation of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Societies, Honorary Professor of China Beijing International Acupuncture Training Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Former Head of Two Research Units and the TCM Research Center at the Medical University of Graz, 8053 Graz, Austria

4

Department of Acupuncture, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150006, China

*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2024, 11(12), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11120409 (registering DOI)

Submission received: 16 November 2024
/
Revised: 17 December 2024
/
Accepted: 19 December 2024
/
Published: 21 December 2024

Abstract

Background: Xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) may help prevent stroke. However, heterogeneity can be found in the conclusions of different studies. The relevant evidence was summarized in this systematic review and meta-analysis to further clarify the role of XOIs in the prevention and treatment of stroke, with a focus on evaluating the effects of XOIs in primary and secondary prevention of stroke, acute stroke treatment, and reduction of post-stroke complications. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies on the effect of XOIs in the prevention and treatment of stroke were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to 3 March 2024, along with hand searching. The analyses were carried out using Review Manager 5.4. Results: The analysis included 14 studies (115,579 patients). While XOIs did not significantly reduce the risk of stroke (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.59–1.34), they improved post-stroke functional outcomes, with a reduction in the modified Rankin scale scores (mean difference: −0.6; 95% CI: −0.8 to −0.4), decreased intercellular adhesion molecule-1 levels (mean difference: −15.2 ng/mL; 95% CI: −22.3 to −8.1), improved augmentation index (AIx) by 4.2% (95% CI: 2.5–5.9%), reduced central blood pressure (mean reduction: 4.8 mmHg; 95% CI: 2.6–6.9), and delayed carotid intima-media thickness progression (mean difference: −0.05 mm/year; 95% CI: −0.08 to −0.02).



Source link

Lin Bai www.mdpi.com