Applied Sciences, Vol. 16, Pages 989: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Resulting from the Management of Low-Content Methane in Post-Mining Goafs

Applied Sciences doi: 10.3390/app16020989

Authors:
Alicja Krzemień
Pedro Riesgo Fernández
Artur Badylak
Gregorio Fidalgo Valverde
Francisco Javier Iglesias Rodríguez

Methane emissions from underground coal mines are a significant source of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a major safety concern. In highly methane-prone operations, a large proportion of emissions comes from low-content abandoned mine methane (LCAMM) accumulated in post-mining goafs, where concentrations usually stay below 30% CH4. Building on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) REM project, this paper presents a cost–benefit analysis of a comprehensive scheme for capturing, transporting, and utilising LCAMM from post-mining goafs for electricity generation. The concept involves long-reach directional boreholes drilled behind isolation dams, a dedicated methane-reduced drainage system connected to a surface methane drainage station, and four 2 MWe gas engines designed to run on a 20–40% CH4 mixture. Greenhouse gas performance is evaluated by comparing a “business-as-usual” scenario in which post-mining methane is combusted in gas engines to produce electricity without further GHG cost–benefit consideration. The results indicate that the project can achieve a positive net present value, highlighting the role of LCAMM utilisation for methane-intensive coal mines. The paper also explores the monetisation of non-emitted methane using the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), as well as social cost benchmarks and penalty levels consistent with the emerging EU Methane Emissions Regulation (EU MER).

Source link

Alicja Krzemień www.mdpi.com