Dentistry Journal, Vol. 13, Pages 342: Thermal Effects of Pulsed Infrared Lasers on Zirconia Implants at Different Temperatures In Vitro

Dentistry Journal doi: 10.3390/dj13080342

Authors:
George Kokkinos
Maryam Hafeez
Joseph De Leon
Georgios E. Romanos

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the differential temperature produced on ceramic implants using laser irradiation on a pulsed setting of intrabony defects in vitro. Methods: A ceramic (Zr) dental implant (Zeramex, 4.8 × 12 mm) was placed into a bovine bone block. A three-wall intrabony defect (6 × 4 × 3 mm) was created to mimic an osseous peri-implant defect. Thermocouples were placed on the apical and coronal areas to measure temperature changes (∆T) during 60 s of laser irradiation. The bovine block was heated to 37 °C, and the defect walls were irradiated with the CO2 and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The settings used were pulsed mode for both lasers, with 30 Hz and 1.5W for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and 70 Hz and 2 W for the CO2 laser. The same laser settings were repeated at room temperature (RT, 23 °C). Twenty trials were performed for each experimental group at room and body temperature for assessment of ∆T. Paired t-test were used to compare the measurements between 37 °C and 23 °C for the Er,Cr:YSGG, and CO2 laser, respectively. Results: The CO2 laser resulted in the highest ∆T (°C) at the coronal (15.22 ± 0.28/8.82 ± 0.21) and apical (5.84 ± 0.14/2.30 ± 0.28) level when this laser was used in both room temperature and body temperature, respectively. The highest ∆T (°C) for the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at body temperature at the coronal thermocouple was 7.64 ± 0.55, while for the CO2 laser, at body temperature was 8.82 ± 0.21. Conclusion: Within the limitations of our study, the use of CO2 laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on peri-implant defects generally appears to be safe in treating peri-implant defects around zirconia implants in vitro.

Source link

George Kokkinos www.mdpi.com