Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 2231: The Impact of Naphthenic Acids on Dynamic Fluid–Fluid Interactions: Implication for Enhanced Oil Recovery

Energies doi: 10.3390/en18092231

Authors:
Bryan X. Medina-Rodriguez
Teresa M. Reilly
Teresa E. Lehmann
Vladimir Alvarado

Previous coreflooding results and wettability analyses in our group show that injection of naphthenic-acid-enriched water can improve oil recovery over traditional waterflooding. This observation is still a subject of research efforts without a definitive explanation. Naphthenic acids (NA) have been reported to drive wettability alteration and increase the water–oil interface elasticity. These alterations depend on the NA carbon number and aqueous-phase salinity, among other conditions, as reported in the literature. Smart-water flooding (SWF) research often links recovery to the initial wettability condition, being higher for initially oil-wet rock. SWF refers to a technique in which the aqueous-phase ion composition or/and salinity are changed to maximize oil recovery. Given NAs’ complex solution behavior, selecting acid combinations that prompt oil recovery is a difficult objective. The aim of this research is to determine the effects of select naphthenic acids on the oil–water interfacial rheology and wettability alteration and how these interfacial effects are associated with oil recovery under spontaneous imbibition. NAs were selected based on their carbon number, molecular structure, and solubility in the saline solution used in this research. We aimed at exploring which NAs should be used to regulate interfacial properties so as to either increase oil recovery or accelerate production. Time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance, interfacial dilatational rheology, and liquid-bridge experiments, i.e., proxy of snap-off, were conducted. A baseline was established using results obtained with a previously tested sulfate-rich aqueous phase, shown to be effective in recovering oil. Results show that NA14 and N18 increase the water–oil interfacial viscoelasticity and induce interfacial healing but led to different recovery factors. N10, while effective at inducing water wetness in oil-wet rock, is ineffective at increasing the recovery factor. We concluded that wettability and oil–water interfacial rheology are not exclusive, and instead they can synergistically favor EOR benefits. Moreover, oil recovery benefits under spontaneous imbibition are shown to depend strongly on the initial wettability conditions.

Source link

Bryan X. Medina-Rodriguez www.mdpi.com