Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 6062: Topology and Reactive Power Co-Optimization for Condition-Aware Distribution Network Reconfiguration


Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 6062: Topology and Reactive Power Co-Optimization for Condition-Aware Distribution Network Reconfiguration

Energies doi: 10.3390/en18226062

Authors:
Arash Mohammadi Vaniar
Mohammad Mansouri
Mohsen Assadi

Distribution networks (DNs) now operate under tighter conditions due to rising penetration of renewables, active prosumers, and exposure to transmission-level contingencies. Distribution Network Reconfiguration (DNR) has proven effective for reducing losses, improving voltage profiles, and enhancing the resiliency of the grid. This paper introduces a three-stage optimization strategy for DNR, combining topological reconfiguration with reactive power support. The first stage, Reconfiguration of Tie-Line Switches (RTLS), utilizes a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm augmented with a Depth-First Search (DFS) mechanism to identify optimal radial structures that minimize active power losses. Once a viable configuration is established, the process proceeds to the second stage, Shunt Capacitor Sizing (SCS), wherein PSO is again employed to determine optimal capacitor sizing across predefined bus locations. The third stage reexecutes the RTLS process using the updated reactive power profile to assess whether further improvements in loss reduction can be achieved. If a superior topology is discovered, it is adopted as the final configuration; otherwise, the SCS solution is retained. This iterative and feedback-based architecture ensures an effective balance between network efficiency and voltage stability using a heuristic approach. The proposed methodology is validated on the IEEE 33-bus and IEEE 123-bus benchmark systems, as well as a custom 7-bus test case. Comprehensive scenario-based analysis, including normal, heavily, and lightly loaded conditions and varying power factor (PF) cases (good and poor PF), confirms the robustness and effectiveness of the approach in achieving considerable loss minimization and voltage profile improvement. For instance, in heavy-load conditions, active-power losses dropped by 39% and 70% for 33-bus and 123-bus cases, respectively.



Source link

Arash Mohammadi Vaniar www.mdpi.com