Alam et al., 2019 [52] | collegiate students with bilateral pronated feet (n = 28) (age 18–25 years) | 2 intervention groups | navicular drop test | seating/standing | TP strengthening and IP stretching (I1) (3 × /6 weeks) towel curl exercises (I2) (7 × /6 weeks) | navicular drop | greater improvement for navicular drop in I1 than I2 group |
Araujo et al., 2017 [53] | healthy females (n = 36) (age 18–35 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | step down | hip and trunk strengthening exercises (3 × /8 weeks) | knee abduction, foot eversion angle | no significant changes in knee abduction and foot eversion |
Bell et al., 2013 [54] | healthy males and females with visually identified knee valgus (n = 32) (age 18–35 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | double leg squat | hip- and ankle-based strength training program (3 × /3 weeks) | knee valgus angle, medial knee displacement | significant reduction in knee valgus angle and medial knee displacement |
Brijwasi et al., 2023 [55] | healthy males and females with flexible flat foot (n= 49) (age 20–22 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | navicular drop test goniometer | standing | ankle dorsi-plantarflexion, short foot exercises, gluteal muscle strengthening, and calf stretches (3 × /6 weeks) | navicular drop, medial longitudinal arch angle | significant reduction in navicular drop and increase in medial longitudinal arch angle in training group |
Chappell et al., 2008 [56] | healthy female collegiate athletes (n = 30) (age 18–21 years) | 1 intervention group | motion capture system | drop jump and vertical stop jump | neuromuscular training program (6 × /6 weeks) | knee valgus angle | no significant change in knee valgus after the intervention |
Da Silva Neto et al., 2022 [57] | recreational runners (n = 24) (age 20–45 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | foot posture index (FPI-6) | standing | gait retraining and static balance training with visual biofeedback (4 × /2 weeks) | foot pronation | significant reduction in foot pronation |
Dawson et al., 2015 [58] | recreationally active males and females (n = 17) (age 24–36 years) | 2 intervention groups | digital camera | single leg squat | hip strengthening training (I1), skill acquisition training (I2) (3 × /6 weeks) | knee frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) | significant reduction in FPPA in both groups |
De Marche Baldon et al., 2013 [59] | healthy recreational female athletes (n = 36) (age 18–22 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | digital cameras | single leg squat | plyometric training (3 × /8 weeks) | knee abduction angle | significant reduction in knee abduction in the intervention group |
De Marche Baldon et al., 2014 [60] | healthy recreational female athletes (n= 28) (age 18–22 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | digital cameras | single leg squat | functional stabilization training (3 × /8 weeks) | knee abduction angle | significant reduction in knee abduction in the intervention group |
Dunn et al., 2018 [61] | recreational runners (n = 20) (age 26–33 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | running | pose running retraining (2 h × 3 sessions) | foot eversion angle | no significant change in peak foot eversion angle |
Ericksen et al., 2016 [62] | recreationally active females with dynamic knee valgus (n = 48) (age 18–30 years) | 2 intervention groups, 1 control group | motion capture system | jump landing | traditional feedback jump landing training and real time feedback jump landing training (I1), traditional feedback jump landing training (I2) (3 × /4 weeks) | knee abduction angle | no significant change in knee abduction angle for all groups |
Ghanati et al., 2022 [63] | male athletes (n = 48) (age 20–25 years) | 3 intervention groups, 1 control group | motion capture system | single leg vertical drop jump | squat and jump trainings with self-controlled feedback (SF) (I1), external focus (EF) of attention (I2), and differential learning (DL) strategies (I3) (2 × /8 weeks) | knee abduction angle | significant reduction in knee abduction for DL and EF groups |
Goo et al., 2016 [64] | healthy males and females with pronated feet (n= 18) (age 20–23 years) | 2 intervention groups | navicular drop test | standing | gluteus maximus muscle and intrinsic foot muscle strengthening (I1), intrinsic foot muscle strengthening (I2) (5 × /4 weeks) | navicular drop | significant reduction in navicular drop in the combined training group |
Herman et al., 2009 [65] | female recreational athletes (n = 66) (age 18–30 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group) | motion capture system | stop-jump | lower extremity strength training (3 × /9 weeks) | knee valgus angle | no significant change in knee valgus |
Herman et al., 2008 [66] | female recreational athletes (n = 58) (age 18–30 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | stop-jump | strength training with video-assisted feedback (3 × /9 weeks) | knee valgus angle | no significant change in knee valgus for both group |
Herrington., 2010 [67] | national female basketball players (n = 15) (age 18–22 years) | 1 intervention group | digital camera | drop jump task, jump-shot task | progressive jump training (3 × /4 weeks) | knee valgus angle | significant reduction in knee valgus |
Howe et al., 2022 [68] | healthy females and males with restricted ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (n = 11) (age 20–22 years) | 2 intervention groups | digital camera | bilateral drop landing | lower extremity strength and ankle mobility training (I1), lower extremity strength training (I2) (3 × /4 weeks) | knee frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) | no significant change in FPPA |
Jeong et al., 2020 [69] | recreationally active females (n = 25) (age 22–26 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | side-step cutting | lower extremity muscle strength training (3 × /10 weeks) | knee valgus angle | no significant reduction in knee valgus |
Jeong et al., 2021 [70] | recreationally active men (n = 48) (age 19–25 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | side-step cutting | core muscle strengthening (3 × /10 weeks) | knee valgus angle | significant decrease in knee valgus in intervention group |
Kato et al., 2008 [71] | female college basketball players (n = 20) (age 19–21 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | digital camera | quick stop-jump task | lower extremity alignment control training (3 × /4 weeks) | knee abduction angle | significant reduction in knee abduction in the intervention group |
Lynn et al., 2012 [72] | healthy males and females (n = 24) (age 20–25 years) | 2 intervention groups, 1 control group | standing navicular height | standing | short foot exercises (I1), towel curl exercises (I2) (7 × /4 weeks) | navicular height | no significant change in navicular height for all groups |
McCurdy et al., 2012 [73] | recreationally active, healthy females (n = 27) (age 19–23 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | unilateral and bilateral drop jump | lower extremity weight-bearing resistance training (2 × /8 weeks) | knee valgus angle | no significant change in knee valgus for both groups |
Mozafaripour et al., 2022 [74] | healthy males with dynamic knee valgus (n= 30) (age 18–28 years) | 1 interventio, 1 control group | motion capture system | single leg squat | comprehensive corrective exercises for hip, leg, and foot (3 × /8 weeks) | knee valgus angle | significant improvement in knee valgus angle in the intervention group |
Mulligan et al., 2013 [75] | healthy females and males (n = 21) (age 22–30 years) | 1 intervention group | navicular drop test | standing | short foot exercises (7 × /4 weeks) | navicular drop | significant reduction in navicular drop at 4-week and 8-week follow-up after intervention |
Okamura et al., 2020 [76] | healthy females and males with pes planus (n = 20) (age 19–22 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | foot posture index (FPI-6), navicular drop, test motion capture system | standing and walking | short foot exercises (3 × /8 weeks) | foot pronation, navicular drop | significant improvement of FPI score in both groups, significant reduction in navicular drop in the control group |
Olson et al., 2011 [77] | healthy females with medial knee placement (n = 18) (age 18–25 years) | 1 intervention group | digital camera, motion capture system | single leg step down | neuromuscular training (3 × /4 weeks) | knee frontal plane projection angle (FPPA), knee abduction angle | significant reduction in FPPA, but no change in 3D knee abduction |
Pabon-Carrasco et al., 2020 [78] | healthy females and males with pronated foot (n = 85) (age 19–22 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | navicular drop test, foot posture index (FPI-6) | standing | short foot exercises (7 × /4 weeks) | navicular drop, foot pronation | no significant change in foot pronation and navicular drop for both groups |
Palmer et al., 2015 [79] | military personnel volunteers with increased dynamic knee valgus and internal rotation (n = 29) (age 29–39 years) | 2 intervention groups | motion capture system | single leg squat and single leg landing | isolated hip strengthening (I1), functional motor control exercises (I2) (3–4 × /5 weeks) | knee valgus angle | no statistically significant improvement in knee valgus for both groups |
Sanchez-Rodriguez et al., 2020 [80] | healthy females and males with pronated feet (n = 36) (age 18–27 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | foot posture index (FPI-6) | standing | foot intrinsic and extrinsic muscle and core muscle-strengthening exercises (2 × /9 weeks) | foot pronation | significant reduction in foot pronation in the intervention group |
Sasaki et al., 2019 [81] | female collegiate basketball players (n = 17) (age 18–22 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | jump landing and single leg squat | core strength training (4 × /8 weeks) | knee valgus angle | significant reduction in knee valgus angle during single leg squat in the intervention group |
Snyder et al., 2009 [82] | healthy females (n = 13) (age 20–23 years) | 1 intervention group | motion capture system | running | closed-chain hip rotation and abduction strengthening exercises (3 × /6 weeks) | knee abduction, foot eversion angle | significant reduction in foot eversion |
Sulowska et al., 2016 [83] | long distance runners (n = 25) (age 22–35 years) | 2 intervention groups | foot posture index (FPI-6) | standing | Vele’s forward lean and reverse tandem gait (I1), short foot exercises (I2) (7 × /6 weeks) | foot pronation | no significant change for both group in total score of FPI |
Tate et al., 2013 [84] | female recreational athletes with medial knee displacement during jump landing (n = 26) (age 18–30 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | motion capture system | counter movement jump | supervised and homebased counter movement jump training (3 sessions/1 week) | knee abduction angle | no significant change in knee abduction |
Unver et al., 2020 [85] | healthy males and females with pes planus (n= 41) (age 18–25 years) | 1 intervention, 1 control group | navicular drop test, foot posture index (FPI-6) | standing | short foot exercises (7 × /6 weeks) | navicular drop, foot pronation | significant reduction in navicular drop and FPI score |
Utsahachant et al., 2023 [86] | healthy females and males with flexible flat foot (n = 45) (age 20–29 years) | 2 intervention groups, 1 control group | navicular drop test, motion capture system | standing and walking | short foot exercises (I1), lower extremity strengthening and short foot exercises (I2) (3 × /6 weeks) | navicular drop | significant reduction in navicular drop for both intervention group |