1. Introduction
Until now, existing studies have focused on the pandemic’s impact on individual vulnerable groups, such as adult migrant workers or school adolescents. However, research on migrant working adolescents, who possess vulnerabilities of both groups, is scarce. Moreover, no studies have specifically explored the strains faced by this group, including gender differences. Whether this group is likely to engage in delinquent behaviors and contribute to social instability remains understudied. Based on these gaps, the current study aims to examine, with a particular emphasis on gender differences, diverse pandemic-related strains experienced by both male and female migrant working adolescents, the associations between strains and different delinquent coping strategies, and possible protective factors for these vulnerable youth.
2. General Strain Theory and Pandemic-Related Strains
3. Digital Copings Under the Pandemic
4. Protective Factors
5. Study Purpose and Research Questions
Existing studies have extensively explored pandemic-related strains and coping strategies across various populations. However, few studies related these concerns with migrant working adolescents. As a unique vulnerable group, the pandemic-related strains they experienced and the coping strategies they used warrant attention. In addition, it remains unclear whether gender differences in strains and digital coping strategies observed in other populations also apply to this group. The inconsistent results of gender differences in protective factors further highlight the need to explore their impacts on migrant working adolescents. Building on these gaps, this study aims to investigate the impact of the pandemic on this group, with a focus on gender difference. The research questions are as follows: for migrant working adolescents in China,
Research question 1: What was the impact of Covid-19 on their stress level, and were there any gender differences?
Research question 2: What was the relationship between various strain types and different digital copings? Did the relationship vary by gender?
Research question 3: What was the impact of protective factors, i.e., conventional beliefs, internal resilience, life satisfaction, on the relationship between strains and digital copings? Did the impact vary by gender?
We firstly hypothesized that males experience higher levels of economic strain, while females face more information, health-related and family relationship strains. Males are expected to play online games more frequently, whereas females are more likely to use social media. In addition, we hypothesized that pandemic-related strains affect digital coping strategies, with males more inclined to use gaming and females preferring social media. Finally, we proposed that conventional beliefs, internal resilience, and life satisfaction moderate the relationship between strains and digital copings, with different effects by gender.
6. Materials and Methods
6.1. Participants
Data for this study were drawn from the fourth sweep of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD4) in China. This self-reported survey was administered between September 2021 and July 2022. The ISRD, an international and collaborative project, investigated adolescent victimization and delinquency across about 35 countries from 2021 to 2023. It employed a standardized set of questions alongside a country-specific module developed by local teams. In China, this module focused on the impact of Covid-19 on delinquent behaviors among vulnerable adolescents.
6.2. Measurement
6.2.1. Dependent Variables
Frequent Internet Use. The current study used changes in adolescents’ Internet use compared to the pre-pandemic period as the dependent variable. The survey included the question, “Compared to preCovid-19, did the average amount of time you spend per day on the following online activities change during the last 12 months?” followed by four questions related to Internet use. For this study, two questions about Internet use for leisure activities were selected: (1) “To play games”, (2) “To use social media (TikTok, Wechat, QQ and Weibo)”. Response options were: 1 = more often, 2 = as often as in other times, 3 = Less often, 4 = No change because I seldom do these things. For each item, response one was coded as 1 (frequent Internet use) and the other responses were coded as 0. In sum, we have two dummy dependent variables.
6.2.2. Independent Variables
Pandemic-related strain. Pandemic-related strain consists of economic strain, information strain, health-related strain, and family relationship strain. Economic strain was measured by summing the scores of four items. Two items assessed the participant’s economic condition, asking whether they became unemployed or had significantly lower income in the past 12 months. The other two items evaluated their parents’ economic condition, asking if the respondent’s father or mother became unemployed in the past 12 months. Responses “Yes” were coded as 1 and “No” as 0. Then the scores across items were summed (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.64). Higher values are associated with higher levels of economic strain. Information strain was assessed by three items that asked respondents the extent to which they felt bothered by an overload of COVID-19-related news, false or misleading information, and inconsistent information. Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 5 = very much). Higher values represent higher levels of information strain (alpha = 0.81). Health-related strain was measured using a sum of nine items that assessed respondents’ worries about infection and the shortage of disinfectant supplies and medicines, etc. Respondents rated each item on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not worried at all, 5 = very worried). Higher scores correspond to higher levels of health-related strain (alpha = 0.95). Family relationship strain was assessed by two items assessing conflicts between parents in the past 12 months, “whether your parents got into physical fights”; and “whether your parents had very heated arguments with each other” (0 = no, 1 = yes). Scores for each item were summed. Higher scores represent higher levels of family relationship strain (alpha = 0.64).
6.2.3. Moderating Variables
Conventional beliefs. Questions about opinions on violence were used to measure conventional beliefs. Respondents were presented with 7 scenarios such as “Sharing online an embarrassing photo or video of someone that he or she did not want others to see” and “Hitting another person without causing injury”, and asked to rate the extent to which they personally see these acts as violence. Each item consists of a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all, 4 = Absolutely). Scores for each item were summed, with higher scores indicating stronger conventional beliefs (alpha = 0.86).
We also adjusted for gender (1 = male, 0 = female), city (1 = Shenzhen, 0 = Changsha), and family intactness (1 = mainly live with parents, 0 = otherwise).
6.2.4. Statistical Analysis
The analytic strategy for this study was conducted in the following steps. Firstly, descriptive statistics for the study variables were reported. The t-test/chi-square test was then conducted between males and females for the dependent variable and each predictor to examine different online behaviors and pandemic-related strains. Next, a logistic regression model was used to test GST. This model was first applied to the entire sample and then separately for each gender. Finally, to identify the moderating effect of conventional beliefs, internal resilience and life satisfaction, interaction terms with the four pandemic-related strains variables were added to the model. All statistical models were fitted using STATA version 17.0. All continuous predictors were standardized for consistent parameter interpretation.
7. Results
7.1. Group Variations in Pandemic-Related Strain and Frequent Internet Use
7.2. Results from the Baseline Model
7.3. Moderating Effect
8. Discussion
Stimulated by the strain resulting from the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic among migrant working adolescents in China, this study concentrates on one of the worst coping strategies, excessive Internet use for gaming, and social media. Based on GST, our study examined the variations between males and females in pandemic-related strains, frequent use of the Internet and the associations among these variables, as well as the mitigating effects of three protective factors on these relationships.
8.1. Variations by Gender
8.2. Main Effects of Pandemic-Related Strain on the Frequent Use of the Internet
8.3. The Moderating Effect of Protective Factors
8.4. Limitations and Future Directions
8.5. Practical Implications
Despite these limitations, our findings have some important practical implications. As females tend to use social media frequently and consistently in daily life, it is important for parents and employers to take targeted interventions. Parents can guide girls to engage in more real-life interactions, such as parties with friends or family members, outdoor activities, and local festivals, to maintain social connections. Employers can organize various offline group activities among staff to encourage more female workers to participate.
Migrant working adolescents, in particular, require more attention regarding information strain, as false information significantly affects their frequent Internet use. Policymakers should strengthen regulations on online information, combat misinformation promptly, and enhance adolescents’ media literacy. Employers hiring young migrant people should prioritize their ability to discern information. In addition, since economic strain can promote online gaming behavior among females, policymakers should create a more female-friendly employment environment and offer more job opportunities for migrate female adolescents. Government assistance and employment support, such as vocational training, can help those facing economic challenges improve their economic stability and vocational skills. Parents should pay more attention to their daughters’ financial situations and provide support whenever possible.
Due to the different impacts of protective factors, the most desirable social policy that prevent the excessive Internet use should cater to migrant working adolescents in different genders. For males, more attention should be paid to their conventional beliefs and cultivate their conventional coping strategies to relieve strains. Male working adolescents should be encouraged to take part in some workshops about discipline and responsibility. Local authorities and employers could also organize and promote volunteering and charities activities to instill a sense of responsibility to the society. For females, emphasis should be placed on enhancing life satisfaction. Employers should ensure reasonable work schedules and provide welfare to assist female working adolescents in maintaining a healthy work-life balance. Providing access to mental health resources and organizing social networking events can further support females’ well-being and satisfaction.
In a broader context, COVID-19 is only one of numerous global threats that cause great damages to our daily lives. Other sudden risk events, such as natural disasters, economic crises, and terrorist attacks, can similarly result in highly disruptive physical, economic, political and social environments. Although these large-scale risks are hard to predict, understanding people’s coping strategies under uncertainty can be beneficial for taking preventive and supportive strategies that mitigate the potential negative impacts. Our findings shed light on stress levels and coping strategies, especially among individuals already facing vulnerabilities, when exposed to such substantial risks. These insights can inform future responses to global crises with more effective measures to support those at-risk populations in coping with such challenges.
9. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study provides a comprehensive picture of gendered strain, gendered coping and gendered protectors among migrant working adolescents in China under the pandemic, a large-scale social crisis. This study expands on the offline framework of GST by addressing pandemic-related strains and cyber behavioral coping strategies among migrant working boys and girls in China, a less-studied disadvantaged group with dual vulnerabilities. Additionally, we examined three potential moderators between strain and cyber coping strategies by gender. Our findings revealed partial support for this extended GST model. Notably, we identified that adolescent male workers are more responsive to the protection effects of conventional beliefs, while migrant working girls are more likely to be protected by high level of life satisfaction. These findings have pivotal implications for the development of effective gender sensitive policies to prevent excessive Internet use among migrant working adolescents during sudden risk events and in the long term.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, all authors; methodology, all authors; software, X.J.; validation, X.J. and H.Z.; formal analysis, X.J. and H.Z.; investigation, X.J. and H.Z.; resources, H.Z.; data curation, X.J.; writing—original draft preparation, X.J.; writing—review and editing, X.J., H.Z. and Q.W. (Qian Wang); visualization, X.J. and H.Z.; supervision, H.Z.; funding acquisition, H.Z.; policy implications, Q.W. (Qiaobing Wu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Direct Grant of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (4052262).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study protocol was approved by Survey and Behavioral Research Ethics Committee, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Ref no. SBRE-21-0330) on 18 February 2021.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in this study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the first author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical considerations.
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Agnew, R. (2013). When criminal coping is likely: An extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 34(8), 653–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality traits, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S., & Rasul, M. E. (2022). Social media news use and COVID-19 misinformation engagement: Survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(9), e38944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alheneidi, H., AlSumait, L., AlSumait, D., & Smith, A. P. (2021). Loneliness and problematic internet use during COVID-19 lock-down. Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M. M., Dwyer, D. S., Vanner, E. A., & Lopez, A. (2010). Adolescent propensity to engage in health risky behaviors: The role of individual resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(5), 2161–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, W.-N., Haas, A., & Xie, Y. (2016). Life strain, social control, social learning, and delinquency: The effects of gender, age, and family SES among Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(12), 1446–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bapuji, H., De Bakker, F. G., Brown, J. A., Higgins, C., Rehbein, K., & Spicer, A. (2020). Business and society research in times of the corona crisis (Vol. 59, pp. 1067–1078). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Barua, A., & Barua, A. (2012). Gendering the digital body: Women and computers. AI & Society, 27, 465–477. [Google Scholar]
- Bermes, A. (2021). Information overload and fake news sharing: A transactional stress perspective exploring the mitigating role of consumers’ resilience during COVID-19. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beutel, M. E., Glaesmer, H., Decker, O., Fischbeck, S., & Brähler, E. (2009). Life satisfaction, distress, and resiliency across the life span of women. Menopause, 16(6), 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Block, J., & Kremen, A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borg, I., & Hermann, D. (2023). Attitudes toward crime (s) and their relations to gender, age, and personal values. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 4, 100111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodeur, A., Gray, D., Islam, A., & Bhuiyan, S. (2021). A literature review of the economics of COVID-19. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4), 1007–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, J., & Guo, W. (2020). Review and prospects of 40 years of market-oriented reform in factor allocation in shenzhen. Available online: https://www.sss.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1074/4301.htm (accessed on 20 May 2024).
- Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor–davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 20(6), 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, C., Wang, L., Fang, R., Liu, P., Bi, Y., Luo, S., Grace, E., & Olff, M. (2022). Anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptoms among high school students in china in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. Journal of Affective Disorders, 296, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, K. W. (2010). The household registration system and migrant labor in China: Notes on a debate. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, F.-C., Miao, N.-F., Chiu, C.-H., Chen, P.-H., Lee, C.-M., Chiang, J.-T., & Chuang, H.-Y. (2016). Urban–rural differences in parental Internet mediation and adolescents’ Internet risks in Taiwan. Health, Risk & Society, 18(3–4), 188–204. [Google Scholar]
- Chapple, C. L., McQuillan, J. A., & Berdahl, T. A. (2005). Gender, social bonds, and delinquency: A comparison of boys’ and girls’ models. Social Science Research, 34(2), 357–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.-X., Cui, L.-R., Liu, L., & Lu, F.-R. (2021). Parent-child conflict among primary and middle school students during the COVID-19 epidemic and its countermeasures. Chinese Journal of School Health, 42, 719–722. [Google Scholar]
- Costes, J.-M., & Bonnaire, C. (2022). Spending money in free-to-play games: Sociodemographic characteristics, motives, impulsivity and Internet gaming disorder specificities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, A., Chen, S., & Nieminen, M. (2015). A repeat cross-sectional analysis of the psychometric properties of the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) with adolescents from public and private schools. Computers & Education, 86, 172–181. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J., Mayer, G., Hummel, S., Oetjen, N., Gronewold, N., Zafar, A., & Schultz, J.-H. (2020). Mental health burden in different professions during the final stage of the COVID-19 lockdown in China: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), e24240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, L., Shao, X., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Miao, J., Yang, X., & Zhu, G. (2020). An investigation of mental health status of children and adolescents in china during the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Affective Disorders, 275, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dufour, M., Brunelle, N., Tremblay, J., Leclerc, D., Cousineau, M.-M., Khazaal, Y., Légaré, A.-A., Rousseau, M., & Berbiche, D. (2016). Gender difference in internet use and internet problems among Quebec high school students. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(10), 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmer, T., Mepham, K., & Stadtfeld, C. (2020). Students under lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0236337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdogan, E., Ozdogan, O., & Erdogan, M. (2015). University students’ resilience level: The effect of gender and faculty. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1262–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eysenbach, G. (2002). Infodemiology: The epidemiology of (mis) information. The American Journal of Medicine, 113(9), 763–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, C., Wang, H., Lu, N., Chen, T., He, H., Lu, Y., & Tu, X. M. (2014). Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(2), 105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: A framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 26, 399–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Pacheco Alises, G., Torres-Jiménez, M., Martins, P. C., & Mendes, S. M. V. (2022). Analysing the relationship between immigrant status and the severity of offending behaviour in terms of individual and contextual factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 915233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredrickson, B. L., & Levenson, R. W. (1998). Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequelae of negative emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 12(2), 191–220. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, J., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1988). Social control theory: The salience of components by age, gender, and type of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 363–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gadermann, A. C., Thomson, K. C., Richardson, C. G., Gagné, M., McAuliffe, C., Hirani, S., & Jenkins, E. (2021). Examining the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on family mental health in Canada: Findings from a national cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 11(1), e042871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gainsbury, S. M., King, D. L., Russell, A. M., & Delfabbro, P. (2016). Who pays to play freemium games? The profiles and motivations of players who make purchases within social casino games. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(2), 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J., Zheng, P., Jia, Y., Chen, H., Mao, Y., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Fu, H., & Dai, J. (2020). Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0231924. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, Y., & Wong, D. S. (2018). Strains and delinquency of migrant adolescents in China: An investigation from the perspective of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 50(4), 506–528. [Google Scholar]
- Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Giudice, V., Iannaccone, T., Faiella, F., Ferrara, F., Aversano, G., Coppola, S., De Chiara, E., Romano, M. G., Conti, V., & Filippelli, A. (2022). Gender differences in the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health of Italian academic workers. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 12(4), 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gloster, A. T., Lamnisos, D., Lubenko, J., Presti, G., Squatrito, V., Constantinou, M., Nicolaou, C., Papacostas, S., Aydın, G., & Chong, Y. Y. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0244809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Z., Wang, L., & Wang, H. (2021). Perceived stress and internet addiction among Chinese college students: Mediating effect of procrastination and moderating effect of flow. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 632461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Government of Yuhua District, Changsha, Population. (2023). Available online: http://www.yuhua.gov.cn/mlyh/rwls/202303/t20230330_11045714.html#:~:text=%E5%B9%B4%E6%9C%AB%E5%85%A8%E5%8C%BA%E5%B8%B8%E4%BD%8F%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3,%E5%9F%8E%E9%95%87%E5%8C%96%E7%8E%87%E4%B8%BA97.5%25%E3%80%82 (accessed on 24 May 2024).
- Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research Center. [Google Scholar]
- Hay, J., Grossberg, L., Wartella, E., & Hay, J. (2018). The audience and its landscape. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- He, A. J., Zhang, C., & Qian, J. (2022). COVID-19 and social inequality in China: The local–migrant divide and the limits of social protections in a pandemic. Policy and Society, 41(2), 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hidalgo-Fuentes, S., Martí-Vilar, M., & Ruiz-Ordoñez, Y. (2023). Problematic internet use and resilience: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing Reports, 13(1), 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Girls at puberty: Biological and psychosocial perspectives (pp. 201–228). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hossain, M. (2021). Gender differences in experiencing coronavirus-triggered economic hardship: Evidence from four developing countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 71, 100555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hou, F., Bi, F., Jiao, R., Luo, D., & Song, K. (2020). Gender differences of depression and anxiety among social media users during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inchley, J., Currie, D., Young, T., Samdal, O., Torsheim, T., & Augustson, L. (2016). Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2013/2014 survey. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, S. (2020). Infodemic: Study on the spread of and response to rumors about COVID-19. Sudies on Science Popularization, 15(1), 70–78. [Google Scholar]
- Jillani, U., Bhutto, Z. H., & Ahmad, K. B. (2023). Emotional Intelligence, Resilience And University Adjustment Of Students: Gender Based Comparative Study. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 169–180. [Google Scholar]
- Junger-Tas, J. (1992). An empirical test of social control theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, E. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–32). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J., LaRose, R., & Peng, W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451–455. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J., Lee, D., & Chung, Y. (2013). The impact of academic stress on delinquent behavior-Focusing on the mediating effect of depression. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare, 41, 101–123. [Google Scholar]
- Kobayasi, R., Tempski, P. Z., Arantes-Costa, F. M., & Martins, M. A. (2018). Gender differences in the perception of quality of life during internal medicine training: A qualitative and quantitative analysis. BMC Medical Education, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leonhardt, M., & Overå, S. (2021). Are there differences in video gaming and use of social media among boys and girls?—A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 6085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L., Liu, L., Niu, Z., Zhong, H., Mei, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2023). Gender differences and left-behind experiences in the relationship between gaming disorder, rumination and sleep quality among a sample of Chinese university students during the late stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1108016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P., & Li, W. (2007). Economic status and social attitudes of migrant workers in China. China & World Economy, 15(4), 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Li, P., & Zhuo, Q. (2023). Emotional straying: Flux and management of women’s emotions in social media. PLoS ONE, 18(12), e0295835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.-P. (2020). Prevalence of internet addiction during the COVID-19 outbreak and its risk factors among junior high school students in Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.-Q., Zhang, D.-J., Yang, X.-J., Zhang, C.-Y., Fan, C.-Y., & Zhou, Z.-K. (2018). Perceived stress and mobile phone addiction in Chinese adolescents: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo, T. W., & Jiang, G. (2006). Inequality, crime and the floating population in China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, D., & Lai, C. (2009). Viewing policy adjustments and changes of “control dropout” in China from student voluntary dropout. Education Research Monthly 2009, 79–81. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, K., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2008). Does life satisfaction predict victimization experiences in adolescence? Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazerolle, P., & Maahs, J. (2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17(4), 753–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metin, A., Erbiçer, E. S., Şen, S., & Çetinkaya, A. (2022). Gender and COVID-19 related fear and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 310, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milovanska-Farrington, S., & Farrington, S. (2022). Happiness, domains of life satisfaction, perceptions, and valuation differences across genders. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newman, G. R., & Wolfgang, M. E. (2017). Comparative deviance: Perception and law in six cultures. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Newman, K. L., Jeve, Y., & Majumder, P. (2022). Experiences and emotional strain of NHS frontline workers during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 68(4), 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngoc, M. T. L. (2024). Spotlighting women gamers and how they play and spend on video games. Available online: https://newzoo.com/resources/blog/spotlighting-women-gamers-and-how-they-play-and-spend-on-video-games (accessed on 12 January 2025).
- Noguti, V., Singh, S., & Waller, D. S. (2019). Gender differences in motivations to use social networking sites. In Gender economics: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 676–691). IGI Global. [Google Scholar]
- Nsoesie, E. O., & Oladeji, O. (2020). Identifying patterns to prevent the spread of misinformation during epidemics. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallavicini, F., Pepe, A., & Mantovani, F. (2022). The effects of playing video games on stress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, and gaming disorder during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: PRISMA systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(6), 334–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pearlin, L. I., & Bierman, A. (2013). Current issues and future directions in research into the stress process. In Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health (pp. 325–340). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Rauma, D. (1991). The context of normative consensus: An expansion of the Rossi/Berk consensus model, with an application to crime seriousness. Social Science Research, 20(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rebellon, C. J., Manasse, M. E., Agnew, R., Van Gundy, K. T., & Cohn, E. S. (2016). The relationship between gender and delinquency: Assessing the mediating role of anticipated guilt. Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez-Barcenilla, E., & Ortega-Mohedano, F. (2022). Moving towards the end of gender differences in the habits of use and consumption of mobile video games. Information, 13(8), 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnettler, B., Miranda-Zapata, E., Orellana, L., Saracostti, M., Poblete, H., Lobos, G., Adasme-Berríos, C., Lapo, M., Beroiza, K., & Concha-Salgado, A. (2024). Intra-and Inter-Individual Associations of Family-to-Work Conflict, Psychological Distress, and Job Satisfaction: Gender Differences in Dual-Earner Parents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sebastião, R., Neto, D. D., & Costa, V. (2023). Understanding Differential Stress and Mental Health Reactions to COVID-19-Related Events. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sherry, J. L., Greenberg, B. S., Lucas, K., & Lachlan, K. (2012). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In Playing video games (pp. 248–262). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Socal, M. P., Sharfstein, J. M., & Greene, J. A. (2021). The pandemic and the supply chain: Gaps in pharmaceutical production and distribution (Vol. 111, pp. 635–639). American Public Health Association. [Google Scholar]
- State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2002). Available online: http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/tnull_27719.html (accessed on 18 May 2024).
- Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevens, M. W., Dorstyn, D., Delfabbro, P. H., & King, D. L. (2021). Global prevalence of gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 55(6), 553–568. [Google Scholar]
- Styck, K. M., Malecki, C. K., Ogg, J., & Demaray, M. K. (2021). Measuring COVID-19-related stress among 4th through 12th grade students. School Psychology Review, 50(4), 530–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). The role of life satisfaction in the relationship between authoritative parenting dimensions and adolescent problem behavior. Social Indicators Research, 66, 165–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S., & Li, X. (2021). Responding to the pandemic as a family unit: Social impacts of COVID-19 on rural migrants in China and their coping strategies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S., Landry, C. A., Paluszek, M. M., Fergus, T. A., McKay, D., & Asmundson, G. J. (2020). Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 72, 102232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thom, R. P., Bickham, D. S., & Rich, M. (2018). Internet use, depression, and anxiety in a healthy adolescent population: Prospective cohort study. JMIR Mental Health, 5(2), e8471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tu, W., Nie, Y., & Liu, Q. (2023). Does the effect of stress on smartphone addiction vary depending on the gender and type of addiction? Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veenhoven, R. (2017). Measures of happiness: Which to choose? In Metrics of subjective well-being: Limits and improvements (pp. 65–84). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Villaume, S. C., Stephens, J. E., Nwafor, E. E., Umaña-Taylor, A. J., & Adam, E. K. (2021). High parental education protects against changes in adolescent stress and mood early in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Adolescent Health, 69(4), 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waller, N. G., Lilienfeld, S. O., Tellegen, A., & Lykken, D. T. (1991). The tridimensional personality questionnaire: Structural validity and comparison with the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(1), 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J., Huang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, M., Xu, J., & Li, X. (2022). COVID-19 information overload, negative emotions and posttraumatic stress disorder: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 894174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Intervening paths from strain to delinquency among high school and vocational school students in China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(1), 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wegmann, E., Brandtner, A., & Brand, M. (2021). Perceived strain due to COVID-19-related restrictions mediates the effect of social needs and fear of missing out on the risk of a problematic use of social networks. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 623099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiatrowski, M. D., & Swatko, M. K. (1979). Social control theory and delinquency: A multivariate test; Office of Justice Programs.
- Witteveen, D. (2020). Sociodemographic inequality in exposure to COVID-19-induced economic hardship in the United Kingdom. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 69, 100551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wolfgang, M. E. (1985). The national survey of crime severity; US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
- Wong, D. F. K., Li, C. Y., & Song, H. X. (2007). Rural migrant workers in urban China: Living a marginalised life. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(1), 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q., Ge, T., Emond, A., Foster, K., Gatt, J. M., Hadfield, K., Mason-Jones, A. J., Reid, S., Theron, L., & Ungar, M. (2018). Acculturation, resilience, and the mental health of migrant youth: A cross-country comparative study. Public Health, 162, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q., Ren, Q., Zhong, N., Bao, J., Zhao, Y., Du, J., Chen, T., & Zhao, M. (2022). Internet behavior patterns of adolescents before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 947360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Q., Tsang, B., & Ming, H. (2014). Social capital, family support, resilience and educational outcomes of Chinese migrant children. British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 636–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S., Zhang, K., Parks-Stamm, E. J., Hu, Z., Ji, Y., & Cui, X. (2021). Increases in anxiety and depression during COVID-19: A large longitudinal study from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 706601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yıldız, E., & Çiftçi, M. Ç. (2023). The relationship between COVID-19 fear levels and healthy lifestyle behaviors of elderly individuals: A cross-sectional study. Psychogeriatrics, 23(3), 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, S.-J., Zhang, L.-G., Wang, L.-L., Guo, Z.-C., Wang, J.-Q., Chen, J.-C., Liu, M., Chen, X., & Chen, J.-X. (2020). Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates of psychological health problems in Chinese adolescents during the outbreak of COVID-19. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 749–758. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, S., Zhuang, Y., & Ip, P. (2021). Impacts on children and adolescents’ lifestyle, social support and their association with negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Relationship between information strain and online games at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean) among male workers.
Figure 1.
Relationship between information strain and online games at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean) among male workers.
Relationship between health-related strain and online games at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean) among male workers.
Figure 2.
Relationship between health-related strain and online games at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean) among male workers.
Relationship between health-related strain and online games at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean) among female workers.
Figure 3.
Relationship between health-related strain and online games at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean) among female workers.
Relationship between information strain and online games at low life satisfaction (1 SD below the mean) and high life satisfaction (1 SD above the mean) among female workers.
Figure 4.
Relationship between information strain and online games at low life satisfaction (1 SD below the mean) and high life satisfaction (1 SD above the mean) among female workers.
Relationship between health-related strain and online games at low life satisfaction (1 SD below the mean) and high life satisfaction (1 SD above the mean) among female workers.
Figure 5.
Relationship between health-related strain and online games at low life satisfaction (1 SD below the mean) and high life satisfaction (1 SD above the mean) among female workers.
Relationship between information strain and online social media at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean).
Figure 6.
Relationship between information strain and online social media at low conventional beliefs (1 SD below the mean) and high conventional beliefs (1 SD above the mean).
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics.
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics.
Mean/Percentages (SD) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Full (N = 769) | Male (N = 352) | Female (N = 417) | |
Digital copings | 0.56 (0.50) | 0.51 (0.50) | 0.60 * (0.49) |
Online games | 0.32 (0.47) | 0.33 (0.47) | 0.31 (0.46) |
Social media | 0.53 (0.50) | 0.48 (0.50) | 0.58 ** (0.49) |
Pandemic-related Strains | |||
Economic strain | 1.06 (1.12) | 1.03 (1.07) | 1.09 (1.16) |
Information strain | 2.20 (0.33) | 2.21 (0.36) | 2.20 (0.31) |
Health-related strain | 3.23 (0.43) | 3.24 (0.43) | 3.23 (0.42) |
Family relationship strain | 0.17 (0.46) | 0.19 (0.50) | 0.15 (0.43) |
Protective Factors | |||
Conventional beliefs | 3.03 (0.26) | 2.98 (0.30) | 3.06 *** (0.22) |
Internal resilience | 1.02 (0.32) | 1.01 (0.32) | 1.02 (0.32) |
Life satisfaction | 1.49 (0.28) | 1.50 (0.28) | 1.48 (0.28) |
Control Variables | |||
Gender | |||
Male | 45.77% | ||
Female | 54.23% | ||
City | |||
Shenzhen | 58% | 65.63% | 51.56% |
Changsha | 42% | 34.38% | 48.44% |
Live with parents | |||
Yes | 40.05% | 40.06% | 40.05% |
No | 59.95% | 59.94% | 59.95% |
Table 2.
Pearson’s correlations of analytical variables (full sample).
Table 2.
Pearson’s correlations of analytical variables (full sample).
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Online game | 1 | |||||||||||
2 Social media | 0.52 *** | 1 | ||||||||||
3 Economic strain | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1 | |||||||||
4 Information strain | 0.07 + | 0.05 | 0.13 *** | 1 | ||||||||
5 Health strain | −0.10 ** | −0.07 + | 0.11 ** | 0.42 *** | 1 | |||||||
6 Relationship strain | 0.050 | 0.06 | 0.25 *** | 0.09 * | 0.05 | 1 | ||||||
7 Conventional beliefs | −0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | −0.002 | −0.06 + | 0.05 | 1 | |||||
8 Internal resilience | −0.08 * | −0.05 | −0.10 ** | −0.006 | −0.02 | −0.11 ** | 0.03 | 1 | ||||
9 Life satisfaction | −0.08 * | −0.11 ** | −0.18 *** | −0.08 * | −0.06 + | −0.14 *** | −0.01 | 0.12 ** | 1 | |||
10 Male | 0.02 | −0.10 ** | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | −0.16 *** | −0.01 | 0.04 | 1 | ||
11 Shenzhen | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.13 *** | 0.02 | 0.10 ** | 0.07 + | −0.21 *** | −0.01 | 0.009 | 0.14 *** | 1 | |
12 Live with parents | −0.03 | −0.02 | −0.11 ** | −0.02 | 0.043 | −0.08 * | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.19 *** | 0.00 | 0.08 * | 1 |
Table 3.
Baseline model: logistic regression models predicting playing online games.
Table 3.
Baseline model: logistic regression models predicting playing online games.
Variables | Full Sample (N = 769) | |||||
Exp(b) | b | SE | ||||
Strain variables | ||||||
Economic strain | 1.078 | 0.075 | 0.083 | |||
Information strain | 1.317 | 0.275 ** | 0.092 | |||
Health-related strain | 0.718 | −0.331 *** | 0.086 | |||
Family relationship strain | 1.079 | 0.076 | 0.079 | |||
Control variables | ||||||
Male | 1.105 | 0.100 | 0.159 | |||
Shenzhen | 0.948 | −0.053 | 0.164 | |||
Live with parents | 0.939 | −0.063 | 0.163 | |||
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.039 | |||||
Variables | Male (N = 352) | Female (N = 417) | ||||
Exp(b) | b | SE | Exp(b) | b | SE | |
Strain variables | ||||||
Economic strain | 0.791 | −0.235 + | 0.134 | 1.349 | 0.299 ** | 0.110 |
Information strain | 1.302 | 0.264 + | 0.138 | 1.396 | 0.333 * | 0.129 |
Health-related strain | 0.688 | −0.373 ** | 0.132 | 0.771 | −0.260 * | 0.117 |
Family relationship strain | 1.143 | 0.133 | 0.119 | 1.048 | 0.047 | 0.108 |
Control variables | ||||||
Shenzhen | 0.922 | −0.081 | 0.251 | 0.902 | −0.103 | 0.221 |
Live with parents | 0.807 | −0.214 | 0.243 | 1.083 | 0.079 | 0.224 |
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.058 | 0.063 |
Table 4.
Baseline model: logistic regression models predicting online social media.
Table 4.
Baseline model: logistic regression models predicting online social media.
Variables | Full Sample (N = 769) | |||||
Exp(b) | b | SE | ||||
Strain variables | ||||||
Economic strain | 1.042 | 0.041 | 0.078 | |||
Information strain | 1.210 | 0.190 * | 0.082 | |||
Health-related strain | 0.797 | −0.227 ** | 0.083 | |||
Family relationship strain | 1.116 | 0.109 | 0.078 | |||
Control variables | ||||||
Male | 0.661 | −0.414 ** | 0.149 | |||
Shenzhen | 0.981 | −0.019 | 0.153 | |||
Live with parents | 0.948 | −0.053 | 0.151 | |||
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.035 | |||||
Variables | Male (N = 352) | Female (N = 417) | ||||
Exp(b) | b | SE | Exp(b) | b | SE | |
Strain variables Economic strain | 0.961 | −0.040 | 0.119 | 1.112 | 0.106 | 0.105 |
Information strain | 1.283 | 0.249 * | 0.126 | 1.167 | 0.154 | 0.110 |
Health-related strain | 0.724 | −0.323 * | 0.127 | 0.879 | −0.128 | 0.111 |
Family relationship strain | 1.117 | 0.111 | 0.114 | 1.117 | 0.111 | 0.110 |
Control variables | ||||||
Shenzhen | 0.910 | −0.094 | 0.235 | 1.015 | 0.015 | 0.204 |
Live with parents | 0.773 | −0.257 | 0.226 | 1.137 | 0.128 | 0.206 |
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.042 | 0.018 |
Table 5.
Logistic regression models predicting playing online games for male workers with moderators.
Table 5.
Logistic regression models predicting playing online games for male workers with moderators.
Variables | Model 1 | Moderator: Conventional Beliefs | Moderator: Internal Resilience | Moderator: Life Satisfaction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
Strain variables Economic strain | −0.258 + | 0.137 | −0.249 + | 0.136 | −0.258 + | 0.136 | −0.256 + | 0.136 |
Information strain | 0.260 + | 0.141 | 0.325 * | 0.149 | 0.302 * | 0.149 | 0.257 + | 0.139 |
Health-related strain | −0.380 ** | 0.133 | −0.458 ** | 0.146 | −0.409 ** | 0.141 | −0.367 ** | 0.133 |
Family relationship strain | 0.141 | 0.121 | 0.150 | 0.123 | 0.120 | 0.123 | 0.105 | 0.124 |
Moderators | ||||||||
Conventional beliefs | −0.173 | 0.117 | −0.155 | 0.126 | ||||
Internal resilience | −0.077 | 0.119 | −0.076 | 0.120 | ||||
Life satisfaction | −0.094 | 0.120 | −0.086 | 0.132 | ||||
M × Economic strain | 0.115 | 0.127 | −0.057 | 0.121 | 0.082 | 0.131 | ||
M × Information strain | −0.333 + | 0.185 | −0.011 | 0.148 | −0.103 | 0.152 | ||
M × health-related strain | 0.362 + | 0.193 | 0.111 | 0.148 | −0.032 | 0.156 | ||
M × relationship strain | −0.082 | 0.128 | 0.130 | 0.148 | −0.077 | 0.108 | ||
Control variables | ||||||||
Shenzhen | −0.189 | 0.259 | −0.214 | 0.260 | −0.117 | 0.255 | −0.078 | 0.254 |
Live with parents | −0.161 | 0.247 | −0.126 | 0.248 | −0.194 | 0.245 | −0.193 | 0.247 |
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.071 | 0.088 | 0.068 | 0.067 |
Table 6.
Logistic regression models predicting playing online games for female workers with moderators.
Table 6.
Logistic regression models predicting playing online games for female workers with moderators.
Variables | Model 1 | Moderator: Conventional Beliefs | Moderator: Internal Resilience | Moderator: Life Satisfaction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
Strain variables Economic strain | 0.263 * | 0.112 | 0.304 ** | 0.112 | 0.283 * | 0.113 | 0.248 * | 0.114 |
Information strain | 0.320 * | 0.135 | 0.368 ** | 0.133 | 0.422 ** | 0.149 | 0.370 ** | 0.133 |
Health-related strain | −0.269 * | 0.119 | −0.317 * | 0.125 | −0.269 * | 0.121 | −0.303 * | 0.123 |
Family relationship strain | −0.032 | 0.114 | 0.058 | 0.119 | −0.067 | 0.137 | 0.050 | 0.111 |
Moderators | ||||||||
Conventional beliefs | 0.105 | 0.125 | 0.058 | 0.141 | ||||
Internal resilience | −0.233 * | 0.112 | −0.225 + | 0.115 | ||||
Life satisfaction | −0.178 | 0.111 | −0.224 + | 0.131 | ||||
M × Economic strain | −0.118 | 0.127 | −0.075 | 0.108 | 0.004 | 0.117 | ||
M × Information strain | −0.010 | 0.128 | −0.208 | 0.155 | −0.303 * | 0.154 | ||
M × health-related strain | 0.302 + | 0.161 | 0.153 | 0.114 | 0.311 * | 0.158 | ||
M × relationship strain | −0.048 | 0.162 | −0.061 | 0.108 | 0.038 | 0.110 | ||
Control variables | ||||||||
Shenzhen | −0.033 | 0.229 | −0.057 | 0.230 | −0.082 | 0.224 | −0.056 | 0.225 |
Live with parents | 0.138 | 0.231 | 0.074 | 0.227 | 0.064 | 0.227 | 0.165 | 0.230 |
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.090 | 0.086 | 0.090 | 0.094 |
Table 7.
Logistic regression models predicting online social media for male workers with moderators.
Table 7.
Logistic regression models predicting online social media for male workers with moderators.
Variables | Model 1 | Moderator: Conventional Beliefs | Moderator: Internal Resilience | Moderator: Life Satisfaction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | b | SE | |
Strain variables Economic strain | −0.047 | 0.120 | −0.067 | 0.121 | −0.049 | 0.120 | −0.054 | 0.120 |
Information strain | 0.246 + | 0.128 | 0.339 * | 0.142 | 0.236 + | 0.135 | 0.253 * | 0.129 |
Health-related strain | −0.323 * | 0.127 | −0.411 ** | 0.141 | −0.318 * | 0.134 | −0.339 ** | 0.130 |
Family relationship strain | 0.110 | 0.114 | 0.122 | 0.116 | 0.108 | 0.116 | 0.080 | 0.117 |
Moderators | ||||||||
Conventional beliefs | −0.03 | 0.112 | 0.012 | 0.122 | ||||
Internal resilience | −0.016 | 0.110 | −0.002 | 0.112 | ||||
Life satisfaction | −0.040 | 0.113 | −0.018 | 0.125 | ||||
M × Economic strain | 0.152 | 0.118 | −0.070 | 0.109 | 0.047 | 0.120 | ||
M × Information strain | −0.465 * | 0.185 | 0.061 | 0.137 | −0.195 | 0.144 | ||
M × health-related strain | 0.296 | 0.184 | −0.005 | 0.138 | 0.126 | 0.155 | ||
M × relationship strain | −0.038 | 0.122 | 0.084 | 0.138 | −0.130 | 0.110 | ||
Control variables | ||||||||
Shenzhen | −0.116 | 0.241 | −0.150 | 0.242 | −0.099 | 0.238 | −0.071 | 0.238 |
Live with parents | −0.241 | 0.228 | −0.183 | 0.230 | −0.250 | 0.227 | −0.256 | 0.230 |
Nagelkerke’s R2 | 0.043 | 0.072 | 0.046 | 0.057 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Source link
Xinge Jia www.mdpi.com