JEMR, Vol. 19, Pages 7: Analyzing the “Opposite” Approach in Additions to Historic Buildings Using Visual Attention Tools: Dresden Military History Museum Case

Journal of Eye Movement Research doi: 10.3390/jemr19010007

Authors:
Nuray Özkaraca Özalp
Hicran Hanım Halaç
Mehmet Fatih Özalp
Fikret Bademci

From past to present, modern additions have continued to transform historic environments. While some argue that contemporary extensions disrupt the integrity of historic buildings, others suggest that the contrast between past and present creates a meaningful architectural dialog. This debate raises a key question: in contrasting compositions, which architectural elements draw more visual attention, the historic or the modern? To address this, a visual attention-based analytical approach is adopted. In this study, eye-tracking-based visual attention analysis is used to examine how viewers perceive the relationship between historical and contemporary architectural elements. Instead of conventional laboratory-based eye-tracking, artificial intelligence-supported visual attention software developed from eye-tracking datasets is employed. Four tools—3M-VAS, EyeQuant, Attention Insight, and Expoze—were used to generate heat maps, gaze sequence maps, hotspots, focus maps, attention distribution diagrams, and saliency predictions. These visualizations enabled both a qualitative and quantitative comparison of viewer focus. The case study is the Military History Museum in Dresden, Germany, known for its widely debated contemporary addition representing an oppositional design approach. The results illustrate which architectural components are visually prioritized, offering insight into how contrasting architectural languages are cognitively perceived in historic settings.

Source link

Nuray Özkaraca Özalp www.mdpi.com