Medicina, Vol. 61, Pages 1741: Modeling Pain Dynamics and Opioid Response in Oncology Inpatients: A Retrospective Study with Application to AI-Guided Analgesic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer


Medicina, Vol. 61, Pages 1741: Modeling Pain Dynamics and Opioid Response in Oncology Inpatients: A Retrospective Study with Application to AI-Guided Analgesic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer

Medicina doi: 10.3390/medicina61101741

Authors:
Eliza-Maria Froicu (Armeanu)
Oriana-Maria Onicescu (Oniciuc)
Ioana Creangă-Murariu
Camelia Dascălu
Bogdan Gafton
Vlad-Adrian Afrăsânie
Teodora Alexa-Stratulat
Mihai-Vasile Marinca
Diana-Maria Pușcașu
Lucian Miron
Gema Bacoanu
Irina Afrăsânie
Vladimir Poroch

Background and Objectives: Cancer pain continues to be a major clinical problem nowadays. This study aims to evaluate the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder effectiveness in patients with colorectal cancer and develop machine learning models to predict treatment response for precision pain management. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective observational study, a total of 107 oncological patients were analyzed, with a detailed subgroup analysis of 42 patients with colorectal cancer, hospitalized between July and September in 2022. The pain assessment used numerical rating scales at baseline and 2–3 weeks follow-up. Clinical variables included demographics, disease staging, metastatic patterns, analgesic progression, and medication usage. Machine learning algorithms (e.g., Random Forest, CatBoost, XGBoost, and Neural Network) were used to predict pain reduction outcomes. The UMAP dimensionality reduction and clustering identified the patient phenotypes. Results: Statistical analyses included descriptive methods, Chi-square and Mann–Whitney tests, and the models’ performance was evaluated by AUC. Among patients with colorectal cancer, 73.8% achieved clinically pain improvement, with a mean reduction of 2.62 points and median improvement of 3.00 points. The metastatic site significantly affected outcomes: visceral metastases patients showed median improvement of 3.00 points with high variability, patients with bone metastases demonstrated heterogeneous responses (range: −2.00 to +8.00 points), while non-metastatic patients exhibited consistent improvement. Random Forest achieved optimal predictive performance (AUC: 0.9167), identifying the baseline pain score, bone metastases, Fentanyl usage, anticonvulsants, and antispasmodics as key predictive features. The clustering analysis revealed two distinct phenotypes, requiring different analgesic intensities. Conclusions: This study validates the WHO analgesic ladder effectiveness while demonstrating superior outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. The machine learning models successfully predict the treatment response with excellent discriminative ability, supporting precision medicine implementation in cancer pain management.



Source link

Eliza-Maria Froicu (Armeanu) www.mdpi.com