Pharmaceutics, Vol. 18, Pages 11: A Systematic Review of Advanced Drug Delivery Systems: Engineering Strategies, Barrier Penetration, and Clinical Progress (2016–April 2025)

Pharmaceutics doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics18010011

Authors:
Assem B. Uzakova
Elmira M. Yergaliyeva
Azamat Yerlanuly
Zhazira S. Mukatayeva

Background/Objectives: Advanced drug delivery systems (DDSs) are essential for targeted delivery, controlled release, and reduced systemic toxicity, but their clinical adoption is limited by biological barriers, manufacturing complexities, and cost. The aim of this systematic review is to critically evaluate the quantitative relationships between platform design, overcoming biological barriers, and clinical translation outcomes for DDS developed between 2016 and 2025. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2016–April 2025) in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Included studies focused on experimental or clinical data for nanocarrier platforms (liposomes, lipid nanoparticles, polymer systems, biomimetic carriers, extracellular vesicles). Data on platform characteristics, interactions with barriers, pharmacokinetics, manufacturing, and clinical outcomes were extracted and synthesized in narrative form due to the significant methodological heterogeneity. Results: An analysis of 77 included studies confirms that successful clinical translation depends on matching the physicochemical properties of the carrier (size, surface chemistry, material) to specific biological barriers. Liposomes and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) remain the most clinically validated platforms, exploiting the EPR effect and liver tropism, respectively. Key engineering solutions include stealth coatings, ligand-mediated targeting, and stimulus-responsive materials to overcome barriers such as mononuclear phagocyte system clearance, the blood–brain barrier, and mucosal barriers. Microfluidic and continuous manufacturing processes enable reproducibility, but scalability, cost, and immunogenicity (e.g., anti-PEG responses) remain key translational challenges. Engineered extracellular vesicles, biomimetic carriers, and 3D/4D-printed systems combined with AI-driven design demonstrate the potential for personalized, adaptive delivery. Conclusions: Cutting-edge DDSs have validated their clinical value, but realizing their full potential requires a holistic, patient-centered design approach integrating barrier-specific engineering, scalable manufacturing, and rigorous safety assessment from the earliest stages of development. Further progress will depend on standardizing methods for new platforms (e.g., extracellular vesicles), implementing digital and AI tools, and ensuring translational feasibility as a fundamental principle.

Source link

Assem B. Uzakova www.mdpi.com