Prosthesis, Vol. 7, Pages 46: Evaluation of Complications and Marginal Bone Loss Observed in Prosthetic Restorations Applied to Different Implant Abutment Connection Types: A Retrospective Study

Prosthesis doi: 10.3390/prosthesis7030046

Authors:
Elif Altinbas
Serhat Süha Türkaslan
Zeynep Başağaoğlu Demirekin

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical results of two different implant–abutment connection types (screw-retained/Morse locking taper), marginal bone loss, and complications in prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: In 2017–2018, 579 implants and 242 implant-supported restorations applied to 137 patients were included in the study. Patients were recalled every six months, clinical evaluations were accomplished, and complications were recorded. When examining the distribution of prosthetic restorations by type, it was determined that 38 (15.70%) were single crowns, 136 (56.19%) were fixed partial cement-retained bridge restorations, 53 (21.90%) were fixed partial screw-retained bridge restorations, and 15 (6.19%) were overdenture prostheses. Findings: Overall, complications included eighteen (21.68%) retention losses, nineteen (22.89%) instances of screw loosening, twenty-one (25.30%) veneer ceramic fractures, three (3.61%) acrylic base fractures, fourteen (16.87%) cases of peri-implantitis, and eight (9.64%) implant losses. Conclusions: Differences in complication rates were observed between implants with different implant–abutment connection designs. While no significant differences were found regarding annual mesial and distal marginal bone loss for implants with conical locking connections, a significant difference was detected in those with screw-retained connections. In both implant groups, mesial and distal marginal bone loss progressed gradually over the follow-up period.

Source link

Elif Altinbas www.mdpi.com