SIUJ, Vol. 7, Pages 17: Evolution of the Bladder Cancer Pathway in a Secondary Care Unit Incorporating Transurethral Laser Ablation and ‘Bladder Cancer Surgery Planning Meetings’

Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal doi: 10.3390/siuj7010017

Authors:
Alexander Katz-Summercorn
Sherif Heba
Stefanos Almpanis
Shiv Kumar Pandian

Background/Objectives: Transurethral Laser Ablation (TULA) is fast evolving as a surgical procedure, especially for small or recurrent bladder tumours. It offers a safe alternative for patients who are unsuitable for general anaesthetic (GA) or who cannot obtain timely pre-operative assessments for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT). Patients are identified for TULA in ‘Bladder Cancer Surgery Planning Meetings’ (BSPMs) and this significantly reduces their cancer waiting time (CWT). Its effectiveness as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool, including its complications and costs, has been assessed. Methods: All TULA procedures performed at the Trust were studied in two cycles. The first between August 2023 and November 2024, prior to initial audit, and then up to September 2025. Case notes, operation notes, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed with a flexible cystoscope and ‘cold cup’ biopsies with further ablation and haemostasis using a 1470 nm diode laser at 4 watts and 400 µm laser fibre. Patients were identified for TULA based on tumour size, location, and fitness for general anaesthetic. Results: During the study period, 95 TULA procedures were performed with a follow-up period between 4 weeks and 1 year. A total of 86 patients (90.5%) had local anaesthetic (LA) ± intravenous (IV) sedation, with 50% having LA alone in the second phase of the study; of the remaining patients, 8 had GA (8.4%) and 1 (1.1%) had spinal anaesthetic. None of the cases were considered to have missed a significant finding. One case (1.1%) was complicated, with ongoing bleeding requiring bladder washout under GA. BSPMs were introduced in July 2024 and audited in the first phase of this study. A total of 24 (39%) of patients were identified for TULA. Of those, 7 (29%) were originally scheduled for TURBT and were having difficulties obtaining pre-operative assessment (POA) clearance. Cost figures were provided by the hospital’s accountants. Conclusions: TULA has been implemented with a low complication rate and appropriate sampling. In the next phase, TULA will be rolled out to an outpatient setting, performed exclusively under LA. This will lead to a significant cost reduction.

Source link

Alexander Katz-Summercorn www.mdpi.com